Skip to content
Our team has decades of experience serving people across the state and throughout the country.
Madison Office: (608) 257-0040
Milwaukee Office: (414) 271-8650
Get a Free Case Screening
Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment
    • Family & Divorce
    • Labor Law
    • Social Security
    • Employee Benefits
    • Wage & Hour
    • Workers' Compensation
    • STD/LTD Benefits
    • Employment Contracts
    • Duty Disability
  • About the Firm
    • Mission & Values
    • What to Expect
    • Firm History
    • Community Involvement
    • Careers
    • Workplace Culture
    • Offices
      • Milwaukee
      • Madison
      • Chicago
      • Appleton
      • Waukesha
  • Blog
  • News & Victories
  • En Español
    • La Compensación Laboral
    • Ley Laboral
    • Ley de Permiso de Auscencia Médica o Familiar
    • Sueldos y Salarios
  • Contact
  • Search

Employers Cannot Ask Their Employees to Provide Family Medical History

Home  >  Blog  >  Employers Cannot Ask Their Employees to Provide Family Medical History

January 27, 2014 | By Nicholas Fairweather
Employers Cannot Ask Their Employees to Provide Family Medical History

On January 13, 2014, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), announced the resolution of a lawsuit it brought against a New York nursing and rehabilitation center. Under the terms of the settlement, the center must pay $110,400 to 138 employees who were asked to provide family medical histories as part of pre-employment medical exams. Arguing that family medical histories fall under the definition of “genetic information,” the EEOC brought suit under the federal Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act. At the same time, the EEOC brought suit under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) on behalf of three employees denied employment or fired because they were pregnant. The settlement is noteworthy because it is the first “systemic” GINA lawsuit filed by the EEOC. A systemic violation is one in which an employer applies an unlawful policy to a group of applicants or employees.

The GINA prevents employers from requesting genetic information or making employment decisions based on genetic information. The law, passed by Congress in 2008, prohibits employers from discriminating against employees based on their “genetic information,” and from acquiring employees’ genetic information, subject to enumerated exceptions in the statute. In the EEOC’s case, the employer had requested and acquired genetic information “…as part of its pre-employment, return-to-work and annual medical exams of its staff …” In the press release announcing the settlement, EEOC General Counsel David Lopez said, “Employers need to be aware that GINA prohibits requesting family medical history. When illegal questions are required as part of the hiring process, the EEOC will be vigilant in ensuring that no one is denied employment opportunities on a prohibited basis.”

GINA defines “genetic information” broadly:

The term “genetic information” means, with respect to any individual, information about:

(i) such individual’s genetic tests,

(ii) the genetic tests of family members of such individual, and

(iii) the manifestation of a disease or disorder in family members of such individual.

The statute authorizes employees to consent (must be written) to the collection of genetic information. However, any attempt by an employer to discipline a non-consenting employee is likely a violation of the law. The statute also authorizes employers to collect genetic information necessary to certify a “serious health condition” under the Family and Medical Leave Act or when such information is requested as part of a services provided under an employer’s wellness program.

If your employer requests your own genetic testing formation or those of your family members, or, if your employer requests or gathers information about family members’ diseases or disorders, you should consult an attorney.

Contact an Attorney

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Can we communicate with you via SMS (Text) message?
Hawks Quindel is a plaintiff-side firm serving the State of Wisconsin and beyond. In order for your inquiry to be sent to the correct group of attorneys for review, please select one of our areas of practice that best categorizes your legal issue.
After receiving your initial inquiry, our attorneys may follow-up with questions relevant to the area of practice that categorize your specific legal issue.
Are you completing this form on behalf of another person?

  • Employment Flat Fee Consults
  • Short or Long-Term Disability Flat Fee Consults
  • Improper Classification of Salaried Employees
  • Applying for Social Security Benefits
  • How Social Security Evaluates Disability
  • SSDI vs. SSI
  • Short Term Disability Benefits
  • Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Sex & Gender Discrimination
  • Americans with Disabilities Act

Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo

Get a Free Case Screening Call Us Today


Milwaukee

5150 N Port Washington Rd Ste 243,
Milwaukee, WI 53217-5470
(414) 271-8650

Madison

409 E Main St,
Madison, WI 53703
(608) 257-0040

Chicago

111 E Wacker Drive Ste 2300,
Chicago, IL 60601
312-262-7517

Appleton

54 Park Pl #400 ,
Appleton, WI 54914
920-931-2560

Waukesha

500 Elm Grove Rd Ste 205,
Elm Grove, WI 53122
262-439-4450

Attorneys|Practice Areas|About the Firm|Blog
© 2025 Hawks Quindel, S.C. |Sitemap|Disclaimer
Hawks Quindel represents clients throughout the State of Wisconsin, including the cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Kenosha, Racine, Appleton, Waukesha, Eau Claire, Oshkosh, Janesville, West Allis, La Crosse, Wauwatosa, Sheboygan, Fond du Lac, New Berlin, Wausau, Menomonee Falls, Brookfield, Oak Creek, and Beloit, among others statewide. Hawks Quindel also represents Illinois clients throughout the State of Illinois through its Chicago office. In addition, our attorneys represent clients nationwide in short-term disability (STD), long-term disability (LTD), and other employee benefit claims, as well as select out-of-state Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) matters.