Skip to content
Our team has decades of experience serving people across the state and throughout the country.
Madison Office: (608) 257-0040
Milwaukee Office: (414) 271-8650
Get a Free Case Screening
Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment
    • Family & Divorce
    • Labor Law
    • Social Security
    • Employee Benefits
    • Wage & Hour
    • Workers' Compensation
    • STD/LTD Benefits
    • Employment Contracts
    • Duty Disability
  • About the Firm
    • Mission & Values
    • What to Expect
    • Firm History
    • Community Involvement
    • Careers
    • Workplace Culture
    • Offices
      • Milwaukee
      • Madison
      • Chicago
      • Appleton
      • Waukesha
  • Blog
  • News & Victories
  • En Español
    • La Compensación Laboral
    • Ley Laboral
    • Ley de Permiso de Auscencia Médica o Familiar
    • Sueldos y Salarios
  • Contact
  • Search

Pain and Social Security Disability: Proving the Existence of Chronic Pain

Home  >  Blog  >  Pain and Social Security Disability: Proving the Existence of Chronic Pain

March 5, 2015 | By David Zoeller
Pain and Social Security Disability: Proving the Existence of Chronic Pain

On February 20, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued an order further clarifying how Social Security’s Administrative Law Judges must consider subjective complaints of pain.

Objective Evidence of Chronic Pain Often Scant

Many SSDI applicants suffer from chronic pain which renders them unable to work. In such cases, the applicant and his or her attorney must decide how to present these symptoms of pain to the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). Unfortunately, there is no definitive diagnostic test to rate the intensity or persistence of pain. Instead, the applicant’s only “evidence” is their subjective complaints of pain and any diagnostic tests, such as MRIs and X-Rays, which may give credence to their complaints. Worse yet, many chronic pain conditions, such as fibromyalgia, do not reveal themselves on an MRI or other imaging.

Lack of “Objective Medical Evidence” Cannot Be Sole Basis for Denial

Judge Posner recently addressed this issue in Hall v. Colvin, asking a Social Security Disability ALJ to reconsider a prior application denial after finding the ALJ improperly ignored the impact of pain on the applicant’s ability to work. The applicant had previously been found “unemployable” by the Department of Veterans Affairs due to knee, back, and ankle pain, obesity, and fibromyalgia. At the hearing level, the ALJ did not find the applicant’s complaints of pain credible primarily because diagnostic tests provided only limited support for his complaints of pain. Judge Posner rebukes the ALJ, stating her “most serious error…is her belief that complaints of pain, to be credible, must be confirmed by diagnostic tests.” He goes on to reaffirm prior Seventh Circuit case law holding that “an individual’s statements about the intensity and persistence of pain or other symptoms or about the effect the symptoms have on his or her ability to work may not be disregarded solely because they are not substantiated by objective medical evidence.”

SSDI Attorneys Know How to Present A Strong Subjective Case

Of course, to prove the limitations caused by chronic pain, in the absence of diagnostic testing, the applicant will need support from other sources. This is where a skilled attorney can assist. Obtaining the opinions of your treating doctors can provide vital support for complaints of pain. Beyond this, a skilled advocate will understand how symptoms of pain impact an individual’s ability to perform work and can use this knowledge to ask appropriate questions of the vocational expert at hearing. While the absence of a definitive way to prove the existence of chronic pain presents a challenge for the social security applicant, proving pain is by no means impossible. If you would like to discuss your claim for SSDI benefits please call one of our Madison Social Security attorneys at (608) 257-0040.

Contact an Attorney

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Can we communicate with you via SMS (Text) message?
Hawks Quindel is a plaintiff-side firm serving the State of Wisconsin and beyond. In order for your inquiry to be sent to the correct group of attorneys for review, please select one of our areas of practice that best categorizes your legal issue.
After receiving your initial inquiry, our attorneys may follow-up with questions relevant to the area of practice that categorize your specific legal issue.
Are you completing this form on behalf of another person?

  • Employment Flat Fee Consults
  • Short or Long-Term Disability Flat Fee Consults
  • Improper Classification of Salaried Employees
  • Applying for Social Security Benefits
  • How Social Security Evaluates Disability
  • SSDI vs. SSI
  • Short Term Disability Benefits
  • Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Sex & Gender Discrimination
  • Americans with Disabilities Act

Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo

Get a Free Case Screening Call Us Today


Milwaukee

5150 N Port Washington Rd Ste 243,
Milwaukee, WI 53217-5470
(414) 271-8650

Madison

409 E Main St,
Madison, WI 53703
(608) 257-0040

Chicago

111 E Wacker Drive Ste 2300,
Chicago, IL 60601
312-262-7517

Appleton

54 Park Pl #400 ,
Appleton, WI 54914
920-931-2560

Waukesha

500 Elm Grove Rd Ste 205,
Elm Grove, WI 53122
262-439-4450

Attorneys|Practice Areas|About the Firm|Blog
© 2026 Hawks Quindel, S.C. |Sitemap|Disclaimer
Hawks Quindel represents clients throughout the State of Wisconsin, including the cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Kenosha, Racine, Appleton, Waukesha, Eau Claire, Oshkosh, Janesville, West Allis, La Crosse, Wauwatosa, Sheboygan, Fond du Lac, New Berlin, Wausau, Menomonee Falls, Brookfield, Oak Creek, and Beloit, among others statewide. Hawks Quindel also represents Illinois clients throughout the State of Illinois through its Chicago office. In addition, our attorneys represent clients nationwide in short-term disability (STD), long-term disability (LTD), and other employee benefit claims, as well as select out-of-state Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) matters.