Skip to content
Our team has decades of experience serving people across the state and throughout the country.
Madison Office: (608) 257-0040
Milwaukee Office: (414) 271-8650
Get a Free Case Screening
Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment
    • Family & Divorce
    • Labor Law
    • Social Security
    • Employee Benefits
    • Wage & Hour
    • Workers' Compensation
    • STD/LTD Benefits
    • Employment Contracts
    • Duty Disability
  • About the Firm
    • Mission & Values
    • What to Expect
    • Firm History
    • Community Involvement
    • Careers
    • Workplace Culture
    • Offices
      • Milwaukee
      • Madison
      • Chicago
      • Appleton
      • Waukesha
  • Blog
  • News & Victories
  • En Español
    • La Compensación Laboral
    • Ley Laboral
    • Ley de Permiso de Auscencia Médica o Familiar
    • Sueldos y Salarios
  • Contact
  • Search

Unintended Consequences: Doctors’ Notes and Work Restrictions for Pregnant Women

Home  >  Blog  >  Unintended Consequences: Doctors’ Notes and Work Restrictions for Pregnant Women

July 24, 2015 | By Summer Murshid
Unintended Consequences: Doctors’ Notes and Work Restrictions for Pregnant Women

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Young v. United Parcel Service highlighted several of the challenges pregnant women face in the workforce. Young v. U.P.S., 575 U.S. ___ (2015). Peggy Young submitted a doctor’s note to her employer while she was pregnant. In that note, her doctor recommended she not lift more than 20 pounds, even though lifting items weighing up to 70 pounds was considered an essential job function. Young asked for an accommodation to work light duty for UPS throughout the rest of her pregnancy. UPS denied the accommodation and refused to allow her return to work. How Doctor’s Notes Can Hurt Working Pregnant Women The fact scenario of the Young case is not unique. A recent commentary in Obstetrics and Gynecology and an article in last week’s New York Times both highlight the inadvertent problems that can arise out of a poorly worded doctor’s note for a pregnant woman. This isn’t a criticism of doctors but rather a call to make sure medical providers, and patients, understand the consequences of the recommendations made in notes submitted to employers. Here’s how this usually plays out: At one of her appointments, a pregnant female employee talks to her doctor about the type of work she performs and the doctor says, “You should be careful about doing that type of work or maybe, you shouldn’t do that work at all.” The doctor offers to write a note about limiting/prohibiting certain types of work (bending, lifting, stooping, etc.). The patient takes the note to her employer who then says, “You have to be able to perform this work if you want to keep your job. If you can’t do it, you can go on unpaid leave.” The employee must then use the unpaid leave she was saving (up to 12 weeks under the Family Medical Leave Act if eligible) during her pregnancy which leaves her with significantly less leave after she gives birth. If she wants to stay home with the baby for longer than her leave allows, she faces termination because her employer does not have to hold her job open after she exhausts her leave. This is the last situation any expecting mother wants to be in and it may perhaps have been avoided altogether with a more carefully worded note. 4 Ways to Make a Medical Note More Discrimination-Proof Below are examples of helpful information exchanges between medical providers and patients that can aid providers in drafting notes tailored to specific patient needs while potentially avoiding unnecessary unpaid leave:

  • Explain the essential functions of your job to your medical provider;
  • Explain other types of work you are qualified to perform that may not be included in your essential job functions and talk to your doctor about whether you would be able to do that work;
  • Have your doctor list all of the types of work you ARE able to perform in the note you are going to provide to your employer – both essential functions and other work you can perform. For example: Patient can drive forklift, process inventory, field customer inquiries, put labels on boxes, and train new employees;
  • Have your doctor provide specific tasks you are restricted from performing but try to avoid vague restrictions. For instance, if possible, a note should say “Patient can’t lift more than 10 pounds more than 3 times per day” instead of “No lifting.”
Of course, all of these are just examples and a doctor’s note should reflect a patient’s specific medical needs. However, a more expansive information exchange between provider and patient will likely go a long way in helping providers draft notes that will make it more difficult for employers to force pregnant women out of their jobs for the remainder of their pregnancy. For instance, employers won’t be able to rely on the ambiguity in a note to tell an employee that there is no work available within her restrictions if she has provided a detailed explanation of all the other work she can do and those tasks are indeed available. It’s also possible that an employer (not all of whom are bad actors) will be able to look at a more detailed note and identify areas in which an individual can still be of service to the company in a slightly different capacity during the remainder of the pregnancy. Pregnancy Discrimination Can Be Difficult to Discern This article is not meant to suggest that medical providers bear the responsibility for employers who engage in discriminatory behavior or that more detailed notes will eliminate these types of concerns for pregnant women. It’s not clear, for instance, that a more detailed note would have changed the outcome for Peggy Young. Indeed, even if you provide a detailed doctor’s note, your employer may still require you to take an unpaid leave. If that happens, it’s worth consulting an attorney to discuss whether or not there has been unlawful discrimination on the part of your employer. After the Young case, which Peggy Young ultimately won before the United States Supreme Court, a woman may show that she was subject to disparate treatment from her employer if she can prove that the employer’s actions and decisions were based on her status as a pregnant person. In other words, if an employer agrees to allow anyone who is not pregnant to perform light duty and only requires pregnant women to take unpaid leave in light of restrictions, there might be sufficient evidence to prove discrimination. If you believe you have been a victim of discrimination and would like to consult with one of our attorneys, call 414-271-8650.

Contact an Attorney

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Can we communicate with you via SMS (Text) message?
Hawks Quindel is a plaintiff-side firm serving the State of Wisconsin and beyond. In order for your inquiry to be sent to the correct group of attorneys for review, please select one of our areas of practice that best categorizes your legal issue.
After receiving your initial inquiry, our attorneys may follow-up with questions relevant to the area of practice that categorize your specific legal issue.
Are you completing this form on behalf of another person?

  • Employment Flat Fee Consults
  • Short or Long-Term Disability Flat Fee Consults
  • Improper Classification of Salaried Employees
  • Applying for Social Security Benefits
  • How Social Security Evaluates Disability
  • SSDI vs. SSI
  • Short Term Disability Benefits
  • Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Sex & Gender Discrimination
  • Americans with Disabilities Act

Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo

Get a Free Case Screening Call Us Today


Milwaukee

5150 N Port Washington Rd Ste 243,
Milwaukee, WI 53217-5470
(414) 271-8650

Madison

409 E Main St,
Madison, WI 53703
(608) 257-0040

Chicago

111 E Wacker Drive Ste 2300,
Chicago, IL 60601
312-262-7517

Appleton

54 Park Pl #400 ,
Appleton, WI 54914
920-931-2560

Waukesha

500 Elm Grove Rd Ste 205,
Elm Grove, WI 53122
262-439-4450

Attorneys|Practice Areas|About the Firm|Blog
© 2026 Hawks Quindel, S.C. |Sitemap|Disclaimer
Hawks Quindel represents clients throughout the State of Wisconsin, including the cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Kenosha, Racine, Appleton, Waukesha, Eau Claire, Oshkosh, Janesville, West Allis, La Crosse, Wauwatosa, Sheboygan, Fond du Lac, New Berlin, Wausau, Menomonee Falls, Brookfield, Oak Creek, and Beloit, among others statewide. Hawks Quindel also represents Illinois clients throughout the State of Illinois through its Chicago office. In addition, our attorneys represent clients nationwide in short-term disability (STD), long-term disability (LTD), and other employee benefit claims, as well as select out-of-state Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) matters.