Skip to content
Our team has decades of experience serving people across the state and throughout the country.
Madison Office: (608) 257-0040
Milwaukee Office: (414) 271-8650
Get a Free Case Screening
Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment
    • Family & Divorce
    • Labor Law
    • Social Security
    • Employee Benefits
    • Wage & Hour
    • Workers' Compensation
    • STD/LTD Benefits
    • Employment Contracts
    • Duty Disability
  • About the Firm
    • Mission & Values
    • What to Expect
    • Firm History
    • Community Involvement
    • Careers
    • Workplace Culture
    • Offices
      • Milwaukee
      • Madison
      • Chicago
      • Appleton
      • Waukesha
  • Blog
  • News & Victories
  • En Español
    • La Compensación Laboral
    • Ley Laboral
    • Ley de Permiso de Auscencia Médica o Familiar
    • Sueldos y Salarios
  • Contact
  • Search

Can an Employer Substitute Compensatory Time Off For Cash Overtime Pay?

Home  >  Blog  >  Can an Employer Substitute Compensatory Time Off For Cash Overtime Pay?

May 3, 2017 | By Barbara Zack Quindel
Can an Employer Substitute Compensatory Time Off For Cash Overtime Pay? *Updated 5/3/2017* Under the misleading title of “The Working Families Flexibility Act” (HR 1180), Congressional Republicans are proposing to allow employers to offer private sector employees compensatory time off instead of paying them time and a half for the overtime they work.  Here’s how the law currently works and why employee rights advocates oppose this bill.

Overtime Pay Law in a Nutshell

Private sector employers covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) or Wisconsin wage laws must pay at least time and a half  wages for hours worked over 40 in a workweek by non-exempt employees. Private sector employers cannot provide compensatory time off in lieu of cash for these overtime hours. Moreover, an employee cannot waive her right to overtime pay or agree that only 8 hours a day or 40 hours a week will be counted as hours worked. If an employer allows an employee to work over 40 hours a week, those hours must be paid at the overtime rate.

Requiring Overtime Pay Encourages Fair Treatment of Labor

The requirement for pay rather than time off at some later date is an important protection of the law, as there is no limit to the number of overtime hours an employer can require employees (16 and older) to work. The requirement that employers pay a premium for all overtime hours worked creates a monetary disincentive to working employees more than 40 hours a week, keeping them away from their families and other non-work activities. The overtime pay requirement also encourages employers to hire additional workers rather than overwork a smaller work force.

Public Employees CAN Be Given Compensatory Time Off

The law treats public workers (those employed by State and local governments) differently.  Under certain conditions, these public sector employees may receive compensatory time off, at a rate not less than one and one-half hours, for overtime hours worked rather than cash overtime pay. Law enforcement, fire protection, and emergency response personnel and employees engaged in seasonal activities may accrue up to 480 hours of comp time; all other public employees may accrue up to 240 hours. Unused compensatory time off must be paid to an employee at the time of termination. A public employee must be permitted to use compensatory time off within a reasonable period after making the request, unless it would “unduly disrupt” the operations of the public employer. FLSA regulations state that for an agency to turn down an employee request for compensatory time off it should “reasonably and in good faith anticipate that it would impose an unreasonable burden on the agency’s ability to provide services of acceptable quality and quantity for the public during the time requested without the use of the employee’s services.” 29 C.F.R. §553.25  However, in disputes over an employee’s ability to use accrued compensatory time off on a requested date, courts have given employers leeway to refuse. For example, one court found that an employee who requested two weeks in advance to use his compensatory time off on a particular date was lawfully refused because there were no available leave slots open on that day. Mortensen v. County of Sacramento, 368 F.3d 1082 (9th Cir, 2004). An employer can also require employees to schedule time off in order to reduce the amount of accrued time Christensen v. Harris County 529 U.S. 576 (2000).

New Federal Proposal Would Allow Compensatory Time Off in Private Sector

Given the difficulties many public sector workers have faced with scheduling  compensatory time, it is no wonder that workers’ rights advocates have exposed HR 1180 as an effort to strip private sector workers of their overtime pay protection. The bill offers flexibility to employers, not working families, and undermines the purpose of the overtime pay provisions of the law. For more information, see: Beware the Phony Working Family Flexibility Bill Calling the "Comp Time" Bill a Scam is Putting in Gently If you believe you have not been paid properly for overtime hours or improperly denied use of compensatory time off or payment at the time of termination, contact our Milwaukee attorneys (414-271-8650) or Madison attorneys (608-257-0040) for a free wage and hour consultation.

Contact an Attorney

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Can we communicate with you via SMS (Text) message?
Hawks Quindel is a plaintiff-side firm serving the State of Wisconsin and beyond. In order for your inquiry to be sent to the correct group of attorneys for review, please select one of our areas of practice that best categorizes your legal issue.
After receiving your initial inquiry, our attorneys may follow-up with questions relevant to the area of practice that categorize your specific legal issue.
Are you completing this form on behalf of another person?

  • Employment Flat Fee Consults
  • Short or Long-Term Disability Flat Fee Consults
  • Improper Classification of Salaried Employees
  • Applying for Social Security Benefits
  • How Social Security Evaluates Disability
  • SSDI vs. SSI
  • Short Term Disability Benefits
  • Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Sex & Gender Discrimination
  • Americans with Disabilities Act

Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo

Get a Free Case Screening Call Us Today


Milwaukee

5150 N Port Washington Rd Ste 243,
Milwaukee, WI 53217-5470
(414) 271-8650

Madison

409 E Main St,
Madison, WI 53703
(608) 257-0040

Chicago

111 E Wacker Drive Ste 2300,
Chicago, IL 60601
312-262-7517

Appleton

54 Park Pl #400 ,
Appleton, WI 54914
920-931-2560

Waukesha

500 Elm Grove Rd Ste 205,
Elm Grove, WI 53122
262-439-4450

Attorneys|Practice Areas|About the Firm|Blog
© 2026 Hawks Quindel, S.C. |Sitemap|Disclaimer
Hawks Quindel represents clients throughout the State of Wisconsin, including the cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Kenosha, Racine, Appleton, Waukesha, Eau Claire, Oshkosh, Janesville, West Allis, La Crosse, Wauwatosa, Sheboygan, Fond du Lac, New Berlin, Wausau, Menomonee Falls, Brookfield, Oak Creek, and Beloit, among others statewide. Hawks Quindel also represents Illinois clients throughout the State of Illinois through its Chicago office. In addition, our attorneys represent clients nationwide in short-term disability (STD), long-term disability (LTD), and other employee benefit claims, as well as select out-of-state Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) matters.