Skip to content
Our team has decades of experience serving people across the state and throughout the country.
Madison Office: (608) 257-0040
Milwaukee Office: (414) 271-8650
Get a Free Case Screening
Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment
    • Family & Divorce
    • Labor Law
    • Social Security
    • Employee Benefits
    • Wage & Hour
    • Workers' Compensation
    • STD/LTD Benefits
    • Employment Contracts
    • Duty Disability
  • About the Firm
    • Mission & Values
    • What to Expect
    • Firm History
    • Community Involvement
    • Careers
    • Workplace Culture
    • Offices
      • Milwaukee
      • Madison
      • Chicago
      • Appleton
      • Waukesha
  • Blog
  • News & Victories
  • En Español
    • La Compensación Laboral
    • Ley Laboral
    • Ley de Permiso de Auscencia Médica o Familiar
    • Sueldos y Salarios
  • Contact
  • Search

BEWARE THE POTENTIAL PITFALLS OF QUITTING A SECOND JOB IF YOU ARE RECEIVING UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS!

Home  >  Blog  >  BEWARE THE POTENTIAL PITFALLS OF QUITTING A SECOND JOB IF YOU ARE RECEIVING UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS!

April 10, 2012 | By Katherine Charlton
BEWARE THE POTENTIAL PITFALLS OF QUITTING A SECOND JOB IF YOU ARE RECEIVING UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS!

A recently-issued unpublished decision of the District IV Court of Appeals should serve as a caution to people who hold more than one job and receive unemployment benefits. In Piontek v. LIRC, Cir. Ct. No. 2010CV2020, the appellate court on March 29, 2012, ruled that quitting a part-time job while collecting unemployment benefits after being laid off from primary employment, caused the employee to be ineligible to continue to receive unemployment benefits. Leonard Piontek held a full-time job as a sales representative until he was laid off. He also worked a part-time job as a real estate agent. After he was laid off, Piontek received unemployment benefits for his job loss, and continued to work as a part-time real estate agent. When an opportunity arose to work for another real estate company, and likely make more money, Piontek quit his part-time job to take the new job in the same industry. He continued to receive unemployment benefits until the Department of Workforce Development determined that he was ineligible for unemployment benefits because he quit his second job. A circuit court affirmed LIRC’s affirmation of the administrative law judge’s determination that Piontek was ineligible to continue to receive benefits. The Court of Appeals affirmed the circuit court decision saying that Section 108.04(7)(a), Wis. Stats. made Piontek ineligible for unemployment benefits because he quit his part-time real estate agent job. Piontek unsuccessfully asserted that he was not an “employee” for purposes of the statute because as a real estate agent who was compensated solely by way of commission, he was not eligible to receive unemployment benefits for that work. The Court of Appeals rejected that argument. Ironically, Section 108.04(7)(a), Wis. Stats. permits an employee to quit his or her job to take another job and still remain eligible for unemployment benefits if the new job has a greater average weekly wage. The new job has to be work that is covered by the unemployment insurance law, which Piontek’s was not. Consequently, if a person quits a job for which he or she would not be eligible to receive unemployment benefits and takes a better-paying job that for which he or she would not be eligible unemployment benefits, the person loses eligibility for any existing unemployment benefits. The appellate court noted the inconsistency of the treatment of jobs, but refused to overturn the circuit court’s decision. People who work two jobs should carefully consider the potential effect on eligibility for unemployment benefits before quitting any employment.

Contact an Attorney

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Can we communicate with you via SMS (Text) message?
Hawks Quindel is a plaintiff-side firm serving the State of Wisconsin and beyond. In order for your inquiry to be sent to the correct group of attorneys for review, please select one of our areas of practice that best categorizes your legal issue.
After receiving your initial inquiry, our attorneys may follow-up with questions relevant to the area of practice that categorize your specific legal issue.
Are you completing this form on behalf of another person?

  • Employment Flat Fee Consults
  • Short or Long-Term Disability Flat Fee Consults
  • Improper Classification of Salaried Employees
  • Applying for Social Security Benefits
  • How Social Security Evaluates Disability
  • SSDI vs. SSI
  • Short Term Disability Benefits
  • Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Sex & Gender Discrimination
  • Americans with Disabilities Act

Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo

Get a Free Case Screening Call Us Today


Milwaukee

5150 N Port Washington Rd Ste 243,
Milwaukee, WI 53217-5470
(414) 271-8650

Madison

409 E Main St,
Madison, WI 53703
(608) 257-0040

Chicago

111 E Wacker Drive Ste 2300,
Chicago, IL 60601
312-262-7517

Appleton

54 Park Pl #400 ,
Appleton, WI 54914
920-931-2560

Waukesha

500 Elm Grove Rd Ste 205,
Elm Grove, WI 53122
262-439-4450

Attorneys|Practice Areas|About the Firm|Blog
© 2025 Hawks Quindel, S.C. |Sitemap|Disclaimer
Hawks Quindel represents clients throughout the State of Wisconsin, including the cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Kenosha, Racine, Appleton, Waukesha, Eau Claire, Oshkosh, Janesville, West Allis, La Crosse, Wauwatosa, Sheboygan, Fond du Lac, New Berlin, Wausau, Menomonee Falls, Brookfield, Oak Creek, and Beloit, among others statewide. Hawks Quindel also represents Illinois clients throughout the State of Illinois through its Chicago office. In addition, our attorneys represent clients nationwide in short-term disability (STD), long-term disability (LTD), and other employee benefit claims, as well as select out-of-state Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) matters.