Skip to content
Our team has decades of experience serving people across the state and throughout the country.
Madison Office: (608) 257-0040
Milwaukee Office: (414) 271-8650
Get a Free Case Screening
Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment
    • Family & Divorce
    • Labor Law
    • Social Security
    • Employee Benefits
    • Wage & Hour
    • Workers' Compensation
    • STD/LTD Benefits
    • Employment Contracts
    • Duty Disability
  • About the Firm
    • Mission & Values
    • What to Expect
    • Firm History
    • Community Involvement
    • Careers
    • Workplace Culture
    • Offices
      • Milwaukee
      • Madison
      • Chicago
      • Appleton
      • Waukesha
  • Blog
  • News & Victories
  • En Español
    • La Compensación Laboral
    • Ley Laboral
    • Ley de Permiso de Auscencia Médica o Familiar
    • Sueldos y Salarios
  • Contact
  • Search

GRANDPARENT’S RIGHTS TO VISITATION WITH GRANDCHILDREN IMPROVE WITH COURT OF APPEALS DECISION

Home  >  Blog  >  GRANDPARENT’S RIGHTS TO VISITATION WITH GRANDCHILDREN IMPROVE WITH COURT OF APPEALS DECISION

October 7, 2011 | By Katherine Charlton
GRANDPARENT’S RIGHTS TO VISITATION WITH GRANDCHILDREN IMPROVE WITH COURT OF APPEALS DECISION

Grandparents seeking the opportunity to see their grandchildren, over a biological parent’s objection, have one less hurdle following a recent Court of Appeals decision. In August 2011 the District IV Wisconsin Court of Appeals clarified what is a grandparent’s obligation for a showing to establish a visitation schedule for their grandchildren. When petitioning for grandparent visitation under §767.43(3), commonly known as the “special grandparent visitation provision,” the significant triggering event requirement of Holtzman v. Knott, 193 Wis.2d 649, 533 N.W.2d 419 (1995), does not apply.

In Wohlers v. White, 2009 AP 488 (August 4, 2011), the appellate court considered the situation involving a mother who was incarcerated when her child was born in 2001, and whose parents served as primary caregivers of the child until the father became aware that he was the child’s father in 2004. He then brought a paternity action that established that he was the father of the child. The grandparents, the Whites, and the father, Wohler, agreed to a transition plan that would give Wohler primary placement of the child, but still give the Whites significant visitation with the child. Wohler subsequently sought to amend the stipulated visitation schedule for the Whites on the grounds that the Whites had to prove a “significant triggering event” to provide the basis for them to have visitation rights as non-parents.

Under Holtzman v. Knott, a circuit court may grant visitation rights to a non-parent if the non-parent demonstrates that he or she has a parent-like relationship with the child, and that a “significant triggering event” occurs to justify the state intervention in the relationship between the parent and the child. Usually, that requirement involves demonstration by a grandparent that the biological or adopted parent substantially interfered with the grandparents’ parent-like relationship, and that the grandparents sought court-ordered visitation within a reasonable time after that interference.

The District IV Court of Appeals determined that the Holtzman test requiring a significant triggering event does not apply when the “special grandparent visitation provision,” Wis. Stat. §767.43(3) applies. Under Wis. Stat. §767.43(3), a court may grant reasonable visitation rights to a grandparent if the child’s parents have notice of the hearing, the court determines that the child’s parents are not married, the paternity of the child is determined, and the child has not been adopted.

Contact an Attorney

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Can we communicate with you via SMS (Text) message?
Hawks Quindel is a plaintiff-side firm serving the State of Wisconsin and beyond. In order for your inquiry to be sent to the correct group of attorneys for review, please select one of our areas of practice that best categorizes your legal issue.
After receiving your initial inquiry, our attorneys may follow-up with questions relevant to the area of practice that categorize your specific legal issue.
Are you completing this form on behalf of another person?

  • Employment Flat Fee Consults
  • Short or Long-Term Disability Flat Fee Consults
  • Improper Classification of Salaried Employees
  • Applying for Social Security Benefits
  • How Social Security Evaluates Disability
  • SSDI vs. SSI
  • Short Term Disability Benefits
  • Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Sex & Gender Discrimination
  • Americans with Disabilities Act

Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo

Get a Free Case Screening Call Us Today


Milwaukee

5150 N Port Washington Rd Ste 243,
Milwaukee, WI 53217-5470
(414) 271-8650

Madison

409 E Main St,
Madison, WI 53703
(608) 257-0040

Chicago

111 E Wacker Drive Ste 2300,
Chicago, IL 60601
312-262-7517

Appleton

54 Park Pl #400 ,
Appleton, WI 54914
920-931-2560

Waukesha

500 Elm Grove Rd Ste 205,
Elm Grove, WI 53122
262-439-4450

Attorneys|Practice Areas|About the Firm|Blog
© 2026 Hawks Quindel, S.C. |Sitemap|Disclaimer
Hawks Quindel represents clients throughout the State of Wisconsin, including the cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Kenosha, Racine, Appleton, Waukesha, Eau Claire, Oshkosh, Janesville, West Allis, La Crosse, Wauwatosa, Sheboygan, Fond du Lac, New Berlin, Wausau, Menomonee Falls, Brookfield, Oak Creek, and Beloit, among others statewide. Hawks Quindel also represents Illinois clients throughout the State of Illinois through its Chicago office. In addition, our attorneys represent clients nationwide in short-term disability (STD), long-term disability (LTD), and other employee benefit claims, as well as select out-of-state Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) matters.