Skip to content
Our team has decades of experience serving people across the state and throughout the country.
Madison Office: (608) 257-0040
Milwaukee Office: (414) 271-8650
Get a Free Case Screening
Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment
    • Family & Divorce
    • Labor Law
    • Social Security
    • Employee Benefits
    • Wage & Hour
    • Workers' Compensation
    • STD/LTD Benefits
    • Employment Contracts
    • Duty Disability
  • About the Firm
    • Mission & Values
    • What to Expect
    • Firm History
    • Community Involvement
    • Careers
    • Workplace Culture
    • Offices
      • Milwaukee
      • Madison
      • Chicago
      • Appleton
      • Waukesha
  • Blog
  • News & Victories
  • En Español
    • La Compensación Laboral
    • Ley Laboral
    • Ley de Permiso de Auscencia Médica o Familiar
    • Sueldos y Salarios
  • Contact
  • Search

Is Your Employer Monitoring Your Activities During Off-Work Time?

Home  >  Blog  >  Is Your Employer Monitoring Your Activities During Off-Work Time?

May 20, 2015 | By Katherine Charlton
Is Your Employer Monitoring Your Activities During Off-Work Time?

A California sales executive filed a lawsuit on May 5, 2015, challenging her termination from employment after she disabled a GPS tracking device on her employer-provided iPhone, shining a spotlight on the reasonable expectation of privacy of employees and employers’ increasing use of monitoring devices.  Myrna Arias, a former sales executive for Intermex Wire Service, filed a lawsuit in Kern County Circuit Court, a state court in central California, alleging that her boss, John Stubits, fired her a few weeks after she uninstalled the job-management Xora app StreetSmart, a GPS tracker, which Intermex required she and her sales colleagues use.  Intermex is a wire transfer service for customers sending money to Latin America.  Employees were required to keep their company-issued smart phones powered on 24 hours a day. Ms. Arias did not object to the tracking device during work hours. Ms. Arias and several co-workers asked whether Intermex would track their activities while off work.  Mr. Stubits allegedly admitted that they would and justified the 24/7 requirement as necessary so the employees could answer customer questions.  The suit asks for $500,000 for lost wages and damages for invasion of privacy, wrongful termination and retaliation, alleging that the intrusion would be highly offensive to a reasonable person.  An Intermex executive also allegedly interfered with Ms. Arias’ subsequent employment. StreetSmart is a workplace management app that gives an employer the opportunity to monitor employees who are out of the office by seeing a mobile employee’s route, stops and the length of time spent at each stop, on a Google map. WI Law Protects Workers from Unreasonable Invasions of Privacy Wisconsin law protects employees from unreasonable invasions of privacy by prohibiting unreasonable invasions of privacy, which generally means the intrusion upon the privacy of another of “a nature highly offensive to a reasonable person, in a place that a reasonable person would consider private or in a manner which is actionable for trespass.”  Section 995.50, Wis. Stats.  In addition to the state law protections of privacy, there are a variety of federal statutes which may apply, including the protections of the National Labor Relations Act, and the privacy statutes that frequently are included in various federal statutes, including those which protect against an employer monitoring an employee’s off-the-job political and/or religious activities. Case Law Blank on Certain Privacy-Technology Developments State and federal legislation concerning privacy laws has not kept pace with the rapid development of tracking software and devices.  Case law concerning the reasonable expectation of privacy is changing at a rapid pace, with recent federal court decision in recent weeks concerning NSA surveillance and the police use of cell phone call information without a warrant. The limited case law on this topic generally focuses on whether or not the employer had a legitimate business justification for the tracking that outweighs the employee’s expectation of privacy. U.S. v. Jones Speaks to GPS Monitoring and Privacy Concerns Though it did not involve an employee, the 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case U. S. v. Jones may have shed some important light on this subject when it struck down Jones’ conviction for drug trafficking after law enforcement officials installed a GPS tracking device on his personal vehicle without a warrant. Prosecutors used the information collected by the tracking device to convict him, but the court ruled the use of GPS to monitor all of a private citizen’s movements for a lengthy period of time was a violation of his rights under the Fourth Amendment. If you have a concern about your employer’s requirements concerning tracking devices or programs during your non-work time, please contact one of the employment lawyers at Hawks Quindel.  A subsequent blog by Hawks Quindel wage and hour attorneys will address the potential wage implications of these GPS tracking devices.

Contact an Attorney

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Can we communicate with you via SMS (Text) message?
Hawks Quindel is a plaintiff-side firm serving the State of Wisconsin and beyond. In order for your inquiry to be sent to the correct group of attorneys for review, please select one of our areas of practice that best categorizes your legal issue.
After receiving your initial inquiry, our attorneys may follow-up with questions relevant to the area of practice that categorize your specific legal issue.
Are you completing this form on behalf of another person?

  • Employment Flat Fee Consults
  • Short or Long-Term Disability Flat Fee Consults
  • Improper Classification of Salaried Employees
  • Applying for Social Security Benefits
  • How Social Security Evaluates Disability
  • SSDI vs. SSI
  • Short Term Disability Benefits
  • Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Sex & Gender Discrimination
  • Americans with Disabilities Act

Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo

Get a Free Case Screening Call Us Today


Milwaukee

5150 N Port Washington Rd Ste 243,
Milwaukee, WI 53217-5470
(414) 271-8650

Madison

409 E Main St,
Madison, WI 53703
(608) 257-0040

Chicago

111 E Wacker Drive Ste 2300,
Chicago, IL 60601
312-262-7517

Appleton

54 Park Pl #400 ,
Appleton, WI 54914
920-931-2560

Waukesha

500 Elm Grove Rd Ste 205,
Elm Grove, WI 53122
262-439-4450

Attorneys|Practice Areas|About the Firm|Blog
© 2025 Hawks Quindel, S.C. |Sitemap|Disclaimer
Hawks Quindel represents clients throughout the State of Wisconsin, including the cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Kenosha, Racine, Appleton, Waukesha, Eau Claire, Oshkosh, Janesville, West Allis, La Crosse, Wauwatosa, Sheboygan, Fond du Lac, New Berlin, Wausau, Menomonee Falls, Brookfield, Oak Creek, and Beloit, among others statewide. Hawks Quindel also represents Illinois clients throughout the State of Illinois through its Chicago office. In addition, our attorneys represent clients nationwide in short-term disability (STD), long-term disability (LTD), and other employee benefit claims, as well as select out-of-state Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) matters.