Skip to content
Our team has decades of experience serving people across the state and throughout the country.
Madison Office: (608) 257-0040
Milwaukee Office: (414) 271-8650
Get a Free Case Screening
Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment
    • Family & Divorce
    • Labor Law
    • Social Security
    • Employee Benefits
    • Wage & Hour
    • Workers' Compensation
    • STD/LTD Benefits
    • Employment Contracts
    • Duty Disability
  • About the Firm
    • Mission & Values
    • What to Expect
    • Firm History
    • Community Involvement
    • Careers
    • Workplace Culture
    • Offices
      • Milwaukee
      • Madison
      • Chicago
      • Appleton
      • Waukesha
  • Blog
  • News & Victories
  • En Español
    • La Compensación Laboral
    • Ley Laboral
    • Ley de Permiso de Auscencia Médica o Familiar
    • Sueldos y Salarios
  • Contact
  • Search

Equal Pay Act Claims in Wisconsin: Gender-Based Wage Gap Disproportionately Affects Women

Home  >  Blog  >  Equal Pay Act Claims in Wisconsin: Gender-Based Wage Gap Disproportionately Affects Women

December 21, 2015 | By Colin Good
Equal Pay Act Claims in Wisconsin: Gender-Based Wage Gap Disproportionately Affects Women

The National Partnership for Woman and Families recently released a report which found women in the United States are paid 79 cents for every dollar paid to men, amounting to a yearly wage gap of $10,762 between full-time working men and women. CBGIn Wisconsin, the study found women are paid exactly 79 cents for every dollar paid to men, whereas in states like Louisiana, women are paid 65 cents for every dollar paid to men. The report demonstrates that nationally, on average, a woman who holds a full-time, year-round job is paid $39,621 per year while a man who holds a full-time, year-round job is paid $50,383 per year. The report also found the wage gap persists regardless of industry, occupation, and education level, and will remain present until 2059 at the current rate. This gap is especially pressing for families in which mothers are the primary or sole breadwinners, a number estimated to be around forty percent. With this outrageous disparity occurring in every industry and occupation, everyone—especially women—should learn about and enforce their rights under both state and federal laws.

Compensation Discrimination Under the Equal Pay Act

The Equal Pay Act (“EPA”), which is enforced by the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), is a federal law which prohibits sex-based wage discrimination between men and women in the same workplace who perform jobs that require substantially equal skill, effort, and responsibility under similar working conditions. 29 U.S.C. § 206(d). Job content (not job titles) determines whether jobs are substantially equal. If that showing is made, the employer is liable unless it proves the pay differential results from one or more of the following:

1) a seniority system; 2) a merit system; 3) a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production; or 4) any factor other than sex.

All forms of pay are covered under the EPA, including salary, overtime pay, bonuses, stock options, profit sharing and bonus plans, life insurance, vacation and holiday pay, cleaning or gasoline allowances, hotel accommodations, reimbursement for travel expenses, and benefits. An individual alleging a violation of the EPA may go directly to court and is not required to file an EEOC charge beforehand. The time limit for filing an EPA charge with the EEOC and the time limit for going to court are the same: within two years of the alleged unlawful compensation practice or, in the case of a willful violation, within three years. The filing of an EEOC charge under the EPA does not extend the time frame for going to court. If pay disparity is found, the remedy under the EPA includes a mandatory salary increase, back pay in the amount of the unlawful difference between the wages of the lower- and higher-paid comparator, attorneys' fees, and costs. The EPA also provides for liquidated damages, at an amount equal to back pay, unless the employer proves that it acted in "good faith" and had reasonable grounds to believe that its actions did not violate the EPA.

Compensation Discrimination Under Title VII

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 also prohibits compensation discrimination on the basis of gender as well as race, color, religion, or national origin. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. Unlike the EPA, Title VII does not require the claimant’s job to be substantially equal to that of a higher paid person outside the claimant’s protected class, nor does it require the claimant to work in the same establishment as a comparator. Similarly, Title VII requires plaintiffs to file a complaint with a state or federal agency within 300 days of the adverse employment action, whereas the EPA has no such requirements. To prevail on a claim of wage discrimination, a Title VII plaintiff needs to prove:

1) she was a member of a protected class; 2) she was qualified for the job in question; 3) she was paid less than men for the same work; and 4) the employer’s adverse employment decision occurred under circumstances that raise an inference of discrimination.

In contrast to the EPA, however, a plaintiff seeking recourse under Title VII must also produce evidence of underlying discriminatory motivation or intent to support the discrimination claim. After a plaintiff has made out a “prima facie case,” or initial description of a seemingly unfair pay situation, under Title VII, the burden shifts to the employer to articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the unequal pay. The plaintiff must then prove the employer’s stated reason was pretexual, or not the real reason for the unequal pay. If pay disparity is found, the remedy under Title VII includes front pay, back pay, compensatory and punitive damages, attorney’s fees and costs.

Compensation Discrimination Under the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act

Wisconsin also prohibits compensation discrimination under the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act (“WFEA”). Wis. Stat. § 111.322. In evaluating complaints of sex discrimination in compensation under the WFEA, Wisconsin agencies and courts look to the analysis followed under the federal EPA. Sahr v. Tastee Bakery, ERD Case No. 8800838 (LIRC Jan. 22, 1991). Under that analysis, a complainant must show an employer pays employees of different sexes differently for jobs requiring equal skill, effort and responsibility, which are performed under similar working conditions.

Are You Are Experiencing Pay Discrimination?

If you think you might be experiencing pay discrimination on the basis of your gender, you should:

1) Try to resolve the situation informally, such as meeting with your supervisor to discuss your concern. Be sure to follow-up the conversation with an email or letter which documents your conversation; 2) Ensure that you keep accurate records. In a legal action, you must relay the facts about your situation as clearly as possible. Keep copies of any documents related to employment discrimination such as your pay stubs, emails, memoranda, personnel policies, letters, performance evaluations, and disciplinary actions; 3) Check with your state of local agency that administers state or local anti-discrimination laws; 4) Obtain legal assistance from an employment attorney experienced with compensation discrimination and gender discrimination.

If you or someone you know is being discriminated against because of gender, please contact an attorney at Hawks Quindel, S.C.

Contact an Attorney

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Can we communicate with you via SMS (Text) message?
Hawks Quindel is a plaintiff-side firm serving the State of Wisconsin and beyond. In order for your inquiry to be sent to the correct group of attorneys for review, please select one of our areas of practice that best categorizes your legal issue.
After receiving your initial inquiry, our attorneys may follow-up with questions relevant to the area of practice that categorize your specific legal issue.
Are you completing this form on behalf of another person?

  • Employment Flat Fee Consults
  • Short or Long-Term Disability Flat Fee Consults
  • Improper Classification of Salaried Employees
  • Applying for Social Security Benefits
  • How Social Security Evaluates Disability
  • SSDI vs. SSI
  • Short Term Disability Benefits
  • Long Term Disability Benefits
  • Sex & Gender Discrimination
  • Americans with Disabilities Act

Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo

Get a Free Case Screening Call Us Today


Milwaukee

5150 N Port Washington Rd Ste 243,
Milwaukee, WI 53217-5470
(414) 271-8650

Madison

409 E Main St,
Madison, WI 53703
(608) 257-0040

Chicago

111 E Wacker Drive Ste 2300,
Chicago, IL 60601
312-262-7517

Appleton

54 Park Pl #400 ,
Appleton, WI 54914
920-931-2560

Waukesha

500 Elm Grove Rd Ste 205,
Elm Grove, WI 53122
262-439-4450

Attorneys|Practice Areas|About the Firm|Blog
© 2025 Hawks Quindel, S.C. |Sitemap|Disclaimer
Hawks Quindel represents clients throughout the State of Wisconsin, including the cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Kenosha, Racine, Appleton, Waukesha, Eau Claire, Oshkosh, Janesville, West Allis, La Crosse, Wauwatosa, Sheboygan, Fond du Lac, New Berlin, Wausau, Menomonee Falls, Brookfield, Oak Creek, and Beloit, among others statewide. Hawks Quindel also represents Illinois clients throughout the State of Illinois through its Chicago office. In addition, our attorneys represent clients nationwide in short-term disability (STD), long-term disability (LTD), and other employee benefit claims, as well as select out-of-state Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) matters.