Skip to content
Our team has decades of experience serving people across the state and throughout the country.
Madison Office: (608) 257-0040
Milwaukee Office: (414) 271-8650
Get a Free Case Screening
Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo
  • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Employment
    • Criminal Conviction Record
    • Family & Divorce
    • Labor Law
    • Social Security
    • Employee Benefits
    • Wage & Hour
    • Workers' Compensation
    • STD/LTD Benefits
    • Employment Contracts
    • Duty Disability
  • About the Firm
    • Mission & Values
    • What to Expect
    • Firm History
    • Community Involvement
    • Careers
    • Workplace Culture
    • Offices
      • Our Milwaukee Office
      • Our Madison Office
      • Chicago
      • Appleton
      • Waukesha
  • Blog
  • News & Victories
  • En Español
    • La Compensación Laboral
    • Ley Laboral
    • Ley de Permiso de Auscencia Médica o Familiar
    • Sueldos y Salarios
  • Contact
  • Search

Early PWFA and PUMP Act Cases Show Strong Enforcement

Home  >  Blog  >  Early PWFA and PUMP Act Cases Show Strong Enforcement

April 20, 2026 | By Summer Murshid
Early PWFA and PUMP Act Cases Show Strong Enforcement

Two recent cases under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) and the PUMP Act provide an early look at how courts and juries are treating these relatively new protections. In both cases, employees prevailed—and recovered significant damages.

Pregnancy Accommodations Must Be Taken Seriously

In Tarango v. PermiaCare (W.D. Tex. 2026), an employee requested relatively modest pregnancy-related accommodations, including permission to wear different footwear and to work remotely after giving birth. Those requests were denied. The employee also experienced ongoing workplace mistreatment that had a significant emotional impact. The case proceeded to arbitration, where the employee was awarded $375,835, including $150,000 for emotional distress. The PWFA requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations for known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. This case is an early example of what can happen when employers fail to engage in that process.

Lactation Rights—and Retaliation Protections—Are Real

In Newell v. The Cardiovascular Clinic of West Tennessee (W.D. Tenn. 2026), a sonographer requested time to pump breast milk at work. After raising those concerns, she was disciplined and ultimately terminated. A jury found that the employer unlawfully retaliated against her and awarded $232,174 in damages, including $116,000 for emotional distress. Attorneys fees will be awarded separately. The PUMP Act not only requires employers to provide break time and space for pumping—it also protects employees from retaliation for asserting those rights.

What Employees Should Know

These cases reflect a few consistent themes:

  • Requests for pregnancy or lactation accommodations do not need to be complicated to be legally protected
  • Employers are required to engage in the process, not ignore or dismiss requests
  • Adverse treatment after raising these issues may support a retaliation claim
  • Emotional harm is a recognized and compensable part of these cases

If Your Rights Were Violated, We Can Help

If you requested accommodations related to pregnancy or breastfeeding and were denied, ignored, or treated differently afterward, it may be worth exploring your options. These laws are still developing, but early cases suggest that courts and juries are willing to enforce them. If you have questions about your situation, an employment attorney can help you understand your rights and next steps. Contact us at hq-law.com to discuss your situation.

Contact an Attorney

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Can we communicate with you via SMS (Text) message?
PLEASE NOTE: Only our Madison office can serve cases relating to Criminal Conviction Records.
Hawks Quindel is a plaintiff-side firm serving the State of Wisconsin and beyond. In order for your inquiry to be sent to the correct group of attorneys for review, please select one of our areas of practice that best categorizes your legal issue.
After receiving your initial inquiry, our attorneys may follow-up with questions relevant to the area of practice that categorize your specific legal issue.
Are you completing this form on behalf of another person?

  • Wisconsin Wrongful Termination Lawyers
  • Employment Flat Fee Consults
  • Short or Long-Term Disability Flat Fee Consults
  • Improper Classification of Salaried Employees
  • Applying for Social Security Benefits
  • How Social Security Evaluates Disability
  • SSDI vs. SSI
  • Short Term Disability Benefits
  • Wisconsin Long Term Disability Benefits Lawyers
  • Wisconsin Sex & Gender Discrimination Attorneys

Hawks Quindel, S.C. Logo

Get a Free Case Screening Call Us Today


Milwaukee

5150 N Port Washington Rd Ste 243,
Milwaukee, WI 53217-5470
(414) 271-8650

Madison

409 E Main St,
Madison, WI 53703
(608) 257-0040

Chicago

111 E Wacker Drive Ste 2300,
Chicago, IL 60601
312-262-7517

Appleton

54 Park Pl #400 ,
Appleton, WI 54914
920-931-2560

Waukesha

500 Elm Grove Rd Ste 205,
Elm Grove, WI 53122
262-439-4450

Attorneys|Practice Areas|About the Firm|Blog
© 2026 Hawks Quindel, S.C. |Sitemap|Disclaimer
Hawks Quindel represents clients throughout the State of Wisconsin, including the cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Kenosha, Racine, Appleton, Waukesha, Eau Claire, Oshkosh, Janesville, West Allis, La Crosse, Wauwatosa, Sheboygan, Fond du Lac, New Berlin, Wausau, Menomonee Falls, Brookfield, Oak Creek, and Beloit, among others statewide. Hawks Quindel also represents Illinois clients throughout the State of Illinois through its Chicago office. In addition, our attorneys represent clients nationwide in short-term disability (STD), long-term disability (LTD), and other employee benefit claims, as well as select out-of-state Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) matters.